| University of Hull Home Page | Department of Engineering Home Page | ||
![]() |
||
| Dr. Philip Rubini | ||
|
Department
of Engineering
|
Prediction of Smoke Properties and B. Pierce, Cranfield University, 2002 Abstract This study describes the simulation and experimental investigation of a heptane pool fire, burning within a small compartment, in which interaction between a number of key physical processes is amplified. In particular, the configuration emphasises the coupling of buoyancy induced ventilation, smoke production and radiation heat transfer to the liquid fuel surface, from the luminous flame zone, from the smoke filled ceiling layer and from the confining walls. This study contrasts with those customarily performed for the purpose of model validation in compartment fires, which employ gas burners and so simplify much of the interaction. Initial experiments were carried out using a 0.23m diameter circular pan burning fixed amounts of heptane. Subsequently, a constant supply was used with a smaller circular pan of 0.17m in diameter, in order to introduce experimental longevity under safe, controllable conditions whilst establishing a quasi steady-state system. Issues of nonstationarity in relation to heat-feedback to the fuel surface - an important pool fire mechanism - are discussed. In addition to probe measurements of velocity and thermocouple temperature, the smoke yield was determined using a light extinction technique employing a 670nm wavelength diode laser and photo-diode detector, housed within a novel fully-traversible watercooled probe. Data from these experiments illustrate the importance of accounting for room ventilation in terms of overall production of smoke and sound a cautionary note to the labelling of soot by a convenient marker such as temperature. Numerical simulation of the compartment fire is performed using the field model SOFIE, incorporating a simple evaporation model, which relates the mass-loss-rate of fuel to the net heat flux to the fuel surface and heat of gasification. This relationship assumes that heat losses to the pan, re-radiation by the fuel surface and other enthalpy loss terms, are small. Simulations of compartment fire scenarios using this model to calculate the rate of heat release are reported. Further comparisons are made between the industry standard ’Eddy-Breakup’ combustion model and the ’Laminar Flamelet’ model. In general both the eddy-breakup model and laminar flamelet model tend to underpredict the yields of CO, whilst the eddy-breakup model over-predicts temperature and thus soot. The laminar flamelet approach shows more promise and shows particularly good agreement with the experimental measurements reported here under well ventilated conditions. SOFIE, the predictive tool employed in this research,
has proved invaluable in discerning the reason for apparent ambiguities
in the experimental measurements of soot concentration. The results suggest
that an alternative simplified zone model approach would overpredict visibility
in smoke in terms of concentration, but underpredict in terms of layer
depth, due to its inability to capture the important shape of the hot
upper layer, which varies significantly from the homogenous, laterally
uniform distribution which
|
|